Want to get featured here? Explore premium visibility opportunities.

Contact us

AI NewsSOND, a sleep tech startup from Bose’s former head of sleep, exits stealth with $7M

SOND, a sleep tech startup from Bose’s former head of sleep, exits stealth with $7M

11:05 PM IST · May 27, 2026

SOND, a sleep tech startup from Bose’s former head of sleep, exits stealth with $7M

Traditionally, sleep earbuds have been designed to mask outside noise and promote sleep with calming sounds. But today, a Boston-based startup calledSONDis introducing a new type of earbuds designed to actively intervene to encourage better sleep. Founded by apairof MIT grads, one who is Bose’s former Head of Global Sleep, SOND emerged from stealth on Wednesday with $7 million in funding. Together with the funding, the company introduced its debut product: Dreambuds, a closed-loop, in-ear system that captures 12 physiological signals from the wearer, then acts on them in real-time to help consumers get better sleep. Its initial investment of the $7 million comes from E14 Fund (an MIT-affiliated fund), Crosslink Capital, Ubiquity Ventures, Alumni Ventures, Meach Cove Capital, and Boston Scientific co-founder, John Abele. To work, the device tracks signals like respiration, heart rate variability, cardiorespiratory coupling, sleep staging, body position, snoring, and seismocardiography (SCG, or the mechanical vibrations of the chest wall produced by the beating heart). This sensor data streams in real-time to a cloud-based AI sleep coach that then selects a sleep audio program, or generates one on demand, learning over time which ones work best for the individual user. Users can also interact with the AI sleep coach directly by speaking, asking for sleep insights, or for specific sleep programs from SOND’s proprietary library of over 500 audio programs. (Users can also opt to stream podcasts through the case, if they prefer.) The AI coach can also generate audio, like a sleep story with a certain theme, when asked. Notably, the startup was co-founded and is led by CEOYadid Ayzenberg, who previously worked at Bose as its Head of Sleep Products, where he launched Bose’s Sleepbuds 2 and ran the company’s portfolio of other sleep products. When Bose decided to strategically exit the sleep business, Ayzenberg realized it presented an opportunity to form a startup dedicated to new products in this space, which led him to found SOND in February 2022. “I had spent, at this time, a significant amount of time around physiology, around sensors, around audio…I was meant to do this,” Ayzenberg told TechCrunch, while sitting at an outdoor cafe alongside co-founder and CTO Amir Lazarovich, formerly a senior software engineering manager at Google, alongside their prototype Dreambuds device. The co-founders met at MIT, a meeting that also had to do with sleep. Lazarovich, who was studying distributed systems, had just moved into a family dorm and didn’t have a mattress; Ayzenberg offered him one from his room to use instead. That chance encounter some fourteen years ago led to a lifelong friendship. After MIT, Ayzenberg founded a startup called The Sync Project, which mapped music to physiological factors like heart rate and heart rate variability. The startup was acquired by Bose after four years, and ultimately led to his work with the second generation of Sleepbuds. Bose customers often wanted more from their Sleepbuds than noise cancellation, Ayzenberg says: they also wanted sensors to track their sleep and help them improve it. At the time, technology was not quite at the point of being able to bundle a lot of sensors into a small, AirPods-like form factor while still conserving the device’s battery, however. But by the time Bose was exiting sleep wearables, that had changed. However, Ayzenberg cautioned, the Dreambuds shouldn’t be thought of as what could have been Bose’s Dreambuds III. Instead, he admits the earbuds from competitor Ozlo are more likely what would have been the next step. “We did something entirely different. Maybe the form factor is an earbud, but that’s where it ends,” he said. The system itself runs end-to-end without requiring a phone. Instead, Dreambuds’ charging case included Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, an OLED display, physical buttons, and a speaker. The latter will help you to wake up via your alarm even if you fall asleep before putting in the earbuds. The goal is to stop users from needing to pick up their phone to control the sleep tech’s system. “We have a running joke — we say giving an insomniac a phone is like running an AA meeting in a liquor store,” Ayzenberg says, with a laugh. “The idea here is that all you do is take the buds out and they’ll resume your sleep plan,” he explains. “You can also switch to other sleep plans. And you can talk to the coach, just double-tap and say, ‘I’m having trouble sleeping. I want this, or I want that.’” The sleep coach can help with particular sleep problems by referring to its data about what’s worked for you in the past, whether that was a breathing exercise, a calming track, a soundscape, binaural beats, or something else. Ayzenberg confirms the AI coach will never talk to you unless you engage it with the double-tap gesture, as he acknowledges that it could otherwise startle users or even creep them out. Lazarovich adds that the AI coach will respond based on the user’s current context. “For example, if you engage right before bedtime, it would ask you, ‘Are you ready to wind down?’ But if you engage after you woke up, it would ask you ‘How was your night?’,” he says. In addition to hearing your results from the AI coach, Dreambuds owners can review their data and hypnograms (sleep cycle graphs) in the companion app to learn more about their sleep patterns. The buds themselves have a unique look, as the team put the sensors facing out — opting for an artistic pattern of sensors instead of trying to hide the technology. The buds also feature wide-frequency drivers for high-fidelity audio, along with microphones and sensors for motion detection. SOND has run a couple of comfort studies and betas, and now aims to bring the devices into mass production by Q2 2026, following a crowdfunding campaign to raise additional funds. The company is currently accepting reservations on itswebsite.

read more

Latest AI News

View All News →
How Hexaware's GIFT City Move Gives Indian IT a New Financial Frontier

How Hexaware's GIFT City Move Gives Indian IT a New Financial Frontier

Hexaware plans to create nearly 1,000 high-skilled jobs over the next three years.

1 hour ago

View

Encryption, spyware, and now Mythos: History shows why cyber export control doesn’t work

Encryption, spyware, and now Mythos: History shows why cyber export control doesn’t work

Last Friday, citing unspecified national security concerns, the White Houseordered Anthropicto restrict the export of its powerful AI models Fable and Mythos to anyone outside of the United States, as well as foreign nationals inside the country. Shortly after, the AI giant hastily pulled the plug on both models, which have now been unavailable to anyone for a week. The episode is the first real test of whether the U.S. government can use export controls to contain frontier AI the way it has tried, with very uneven results, to contain encryption and spyware before it. And dramatic as it may sound, how this standoff gets resolved could shape not just Anthropic’s access to foreign markets but the rulebook that other AI labs will have to build around. Some context first.Ever since Anthropic launched Mythos in April, the company has marketed it assome kind of Doomsday cyber machinethat could wreak havoc on the internet if released too widely — which is why, before the ban,only around 150 vetted companies and government organizationshad access to it at all. The goal was helping defenders secure their software and services before the bad guys could reach Mythos-like capabilities. So what triggered the ban? Two subsequent events, reportedly. The first: Anthropic gave a South Korean telecom access to Mythos through its limited partner program, and U.S. officials grew alarmed after identifying the company as one they suspected had ties to China. (The company,widely reportedto be SK Telecom, hasdeniedany China connection.) Amazon CEO Andy Jassy also reportedlyalerted the administrationafter Amazon’s own researchers, he said, found a way around Fable 5’s safeguards. Anthropic disputes the “jailbreak” label, calling it a narrow, already-patched issue rather than a wholesale defeat of the model’s safety measures. The result was the same: the Commerce Department issued an export control directive, and Anthropic had to scramble to immediately limit access to its products — within roughly 90 minutes of being notified, by some accounts. None of this is new, though. Governments have tried to use export controls to limit the proliferation of what they see as dangerous cyber technology for decades, but their track record has been middling at best. The U.S. government was behind what is perhaps history’s most spectacular failure of this approach in the early to mid-1990s. At the time, computer scientists were developing encryption technologies to secure data as it traveled over the internet. One of those encryption products was called Pretty Good Privacy, or PGP, a popular software that could encrypt data and make it virtually impossible to unscramble even if intercepted as it traveled to its intended recipient over the internet. The U.S. government initially saw PGP as a dangerous weapon, fearing it would prevent its intelligence agencies from snooping on emails as they crossed their wires. To stop the distribution of PGP, the U.S. Customs Serviceopened a criminal investigationagainst PGP’s creator Phil Zimmermann for allegedly violating arms export controls. He fought back by publishing PGP’s source codeas a printed book, igniting what is known today as the “Crypto Wars.” Zimmermann later won a key battle when the investigation was closed, paving the way for crucial end-to-end encryption algorithms such as the one used by billions of Signal and WhatsApp users. Later during the early 2010s, researchers began discovering Western-made spyware used against dissidents in the Middle East. In response, several governments agreed to expandthe Wassenaar Arrangement, an international treaty that limits the export of dual-use software and technologies that are used in both civilian and military applications. The idea was to classify surveillance and hacking software as dual-use, thus forcing spyware makers to get export licenses to sell their products abroad. Contact UsDo you have more information about the Mythos ban? From a non-work device and network, you can contact Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai securely on Signal at +1 917 257 1382, or via Telegram and Keybase @lorenzofb, oremail. But Wassenaar has always had two inherent weaknesses. There are several countries that don’t adhere to the agreement, including Israel, which houses some of the world’s most active spyware makers. The agreement also depends on countries applying it to companies within their borders at their own discretion. For a time, the Italian government allowed one of the country’s then-top spyware makers, Hacking Team, a license to export its tools around the world, despite the company’s track record of selling spyware tooppressivegovernmentsthatused itto hack journalists and human rights activists. Since then,othercountriesin Europe have been lax with spyware makers like Italy. Despite numerous scandals, Europe, home tomany spyware and hacking tools makers, hascontinually failed to curb the export of spywareto authoritarian regimes. Critics say that a recently renewed effort across the bloc of 27 member states to tackle its growing problem of spyware exports to authoritarian states “does not go far enough.” Several spyware makers, such as Intellexa, a sanctioned consortium of spyware companies,  have simply moved their operations to countries with lax export controls. Other spyware makers sought to move their operations to Saudi Arabia for similar reasons. There have been some wins. Germany-based spyware maker FinFishershut down in 2022after a multi-year investigation by German prosecutors into the company forallegedly selling spywareto Turkey without an export license. Investigators previously found the FinFisher spyware had beendeployed on the phonesof critics of Turkey’s government. As of the time of writing, the impasse between Anthropic and the Trump administration remains. There is a reasonable chance the administration will buckle and lift the restriction in the interest of keeping American AI companies competitive worldwide — a move that would amount to tacit acknowledgment that AI labs elsewhere, including in China, will likely reach similar capabilities regardless of what the U.S. restricts. Or, American AI companies could end up needing government approval before serving foreign customers at all, a compliance burden that would invariably dent their bottom line. Given the past experiences that world governments have had with trying to control the reach of software, government-mandated export controls are unlikely to be the right approach to stop malicious actors from abusing powerful dual-use cyber technologies.

5 hours ago

View

Billionaire Ambani wants AI in every call, app, and home

Billionaire Ambani wants AI in every call, app, and home

As India searches for a homegrown contender in the global artificial intelligence race, billionaire Mukesh Ambani is positioning Reliance Industries as a national champion, rolling out AI services for phone calls, mobile apps, and connected homes. At itsannual shareholder meetingon Friday, the Mumbai-based conglomerate announced Jio Call Agent, an AI assistant that can join phone calls to transcribe conversations, generate summaries, and perform tasks such as booking cabs, ordering food, and making reservations. The service, which can be activated by saying “Hey Jio,” is expected to launch later this year for Jio’s more than 500 million users. By embedding the service directly into its telecom network rather than offering it as a stand-alone app, Jio is betting AI assistance can become a native feature of phone calls. The approach could reduce consumers’ reliance on third-party call-assistant apps and give Reliance a powerful distribution advantage in an increasingly crowded AI market. Reliance also unveiled an AI-powered version of its MyJio app that can perform tasks on behalf of users, from activating eSIMs to selecting roaming plans, through natural-language requests. The company further introduced TeleFrame, a home display that uses AI agents to proactively surface information and recommendations, such as weather alerts, schedules, and household reminders. The product appears to echo a broader industry push toward ambient AI assistants for the home, an area being explored by companies such asAmazonandGoogle. The announcements mark the next phase of Reliance’s AI ambitions as India seeks to build domestic capabilities in a field largely dominated by U.S. and Chinese technology companies. The push follows thelaunch of Reliance Intelligencelast year, through which the conglomerate aims to develop AI infrastructure and services for consumers, businesses, and governments, including applications that support 22 Indian languages. “India should not be a mere consumer of AI created elsewhere. It must become a creator, adopter, and a global leader in AI,” Ambani, age 69, said. Reliance has been ramping up its AI ambitions through partnerships withGoogle,Meta, andNvidia. Earlier this year, the company announced plans toinvest $110 billion in AI infrastructureas it seeks to establish itself as a major player in India’s emerging AI ecosystem. At the shareholder meeting, Reliance also unveiled a suite of AI services for healthcare, education, agriculture, and small businesses. The products, branded JioHealthIQ, JioLearnIQ, JioKrishiIQ, and AI Vyapar, are designed to operate across multiple Indian languages and cater to local needs, the company said. The shareholder meeting also brought a major development for investorsawaiting Jio’s stock market debut. Ambani said Jio Platforms’ board had approved a draft prospectus for an initial public offering that would include a fresh issue of up to 270 million shares, according to a stock exchange filing. The announcements also raise questions about how Reliance will handle user data as it expands AI services across phone calls, mobile apps, and connected homes. While the company said the services would operate with user consent, it did not answer questions about whether data generated through the products could be used to train AI models or shared with technology partners. Reliance’s AI ambitions come as Indian companies remain heavily reliant on foreign AI models and cloud providers.Recent restrictions on accessto some of Anthropic’s latest models have underscored that dependency, showing how decisions made overseas can affectstartups and businessesbuilding AI products in India — the kind of supply-chain risk that’s pushing Indian conglomerates toward building their own stack rather than renting someone else’s. Last week, Reliance announced acollaboration with Meta to establish an AI data centerin the western state of Gujarat, building on Meta’s earlier investment in Jio Platforms and a joint venture launched last year to develop AI solutions for enterprise customers in India and overseas markets. Reliance is not alone in pursuing AI opportunities.Tata Consultancy Services,Infosys, and rivalAdani Grouphave also expanded their AI initiatives and partnerships with global players, including Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI, as India’s largest corporations race to secure a leading role in the country’s AI future. Nonetheless, for Reliance, the stakes are particularly high; it’s preparing Jio for a long-awaited stock market debut and needs new growth drivers, with the conglomerate’s shares down about 17% this year.

13 hours ago

View

The US banned Anthropic’s Fable 5 release, but the numbers don’t seem to care

The US banned Anthropic’s Fable 5 release, but the numbers don’t seem to care

Just as last week was ending, the US governmentforced Anthropic to pull its two newest models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, citing national security concerns after Amazon researchers allegedly found a way to bypass Fable 5’s guardrails. Cybersecurity researchers havesince signed an open lettercalling the move dangerous, and Anthropic itself noted the same jailbreaks exist in other models. So is this a genuine security concern, or just the latest chapter in a messy relationship between Anthropic and the Trump administration? On this episode of TechCrunch’sEquitypodcast, hosts Anthony Ha, Sean O’Kane, and Rebecca Bellan unpack what the ban means for developers building on Anthropic’s platform and for anyone watching the IPO, why itmight accidentally be good for the company, and more of the week’s headlines. Listen to the full episode to hear more about: Subscribe to Equity onYouTube,Apple Podcasts,Overcast,Spotifyand all the casts. You also can follow Equity onXandThreads, at @EquityPod.

13 hours ago

View