Want to get featured here? Explore premium visibility opportunities.

Contact us

AI NewsAnthropic’s Cat Wu says that, in the future, AI will anticipate your needs before you know what they are

Anthropic’s Cat Wu says that, in the future, AI will anticipate your needs before you know what they are

2:42 AM IST · May 14, 2026

Anthropic’s Cat Wu says that, in the future, AI will anticipate your needs before you know what they are

With the tech industry singularly focused on AI models, Anthropic is having an exceptionally good year. The company may soon pull ahead of its main competitor, as it looks to raise tens of billions of dollars in a funding round that would put its valuationat some $950 billion(OpenAI wasvalued at $854 billionin its March round), and business customers increasingly express aprefererence for Claude over ChatGPT. A recent report showed Anthropicrecently outpaced OpenAI among business customers, quadrupling its market share since May 2025. Cat Wu, Anthropic’s head of product for Claude Code and Cowork, has been a key figure in that success. Since joining the company in August 2024, Wu has helped shepherd Claude through a critical phase, leveling it up from a purely informational chatbot to a coding tool and beyond. Wu, who oversees the development of new features, is frequently paired with Boris Cherny, a core member of Anthropic’s technical staff and the creator of Claude Code, leading the pair to becharacterized asAnthropic’s “Batman and Robin.” Wu sat down with me at last’s week’s second annual Code with Claude conference in San Francisco, where she discussed how she thinks about product strategy, and how she hopes the experience of using Claude will change in the future. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. When you’re looking at product strategy, how much of it is reactive to your peers or your competitors? Do you think about that at all? The main thing that we design for is staying on the exponential, so I think, across our team, we instill in everyone the lesson that AI will just continue to get better. For us, we just need to stay at this frontier. We don’t think about competitors. I think if you do think about competitors, you end up being, like, perpetually two weeks, or like, a month behind how fast you can execute. And so it’s normally not the best way to stay at the frontier. Anthropic released at least six models last year and has already released almost as many this year. Do you expect this pace of development to continue? Our hope is that it continues (laughing). I think the models are still improving at a very steady pace, and so we should be able to keep sharing those with our users. I think the deployments might look a bit different—like how we handled Glasswing, but as much as possible, we want this intelligence to benefit as many people as possible, and it has to be handled in a very safe way, which is why we handled Glasswing [in the way that we did]. [Glasswing is an initiative that Anthropiclaunched in Aprilthat invited a small consortium of partner organizations — including companies like Amazon, Apple, CrowdStrike, and Microsoft — to gain access to its new cybersecurity model, Mythos. Unlike many of Anthropic's other AI models, Mythos is not being given a general public release. The company has claimed that it fears the model — which is designed to scan codebases for software vulnerabilities — is too powerful, and could be weaponized by bad actors.] You said in a previous interview that the future of work is basically staff managing fleets of agents. It seems like that could eventually lead to a situation where the agents are better at the job, or know the job, better than the human. I think it is extremely hard to manage agents if you can't do the job yourself. I think the managers still need to be experts in their domain. It's a new skill set that a lot of people are going to have to learn, but managing agents is actually very similar to being a manager of people, in the sense that you have to understand, like, why did the agent make this mistake? Did it misinterpret my instruction? Was my request under-specified? You have to have the ability to debug it. It does seem like the long term goal is to cut down on team size, though. Because if you have agents doing a job, then you don't need an intern, right? Ideally, I think the idea is that everyone can get a lot more done. I think that, for everyone’s job, there's always this percentage of it that's really tedious. For me, it’s responding to emails. I think everyone has this part of their life...So my hope is that it [the AI agents] actually does that, and then everyone has, like, all these cool things that they will want to build [in their spare time]. What are you guys most excited about in the next six months? I think the next big thing is proactivity. Last year we were in this world of synchronous development. Right now, people are shifting to routines, so like automating, for example, responses to customer support tickets. And I think the next step is that Claude understands what you work on, and just sets up some of these automations for you.

read more

Latest AI News

View All News →
How Katha Room Went From Telling Indian Bedtime Stories to Being an Apple Award Finalist

How Katha Room Went From Telling Indian Bedtime Stories to Being an Apple Award Finalist

Katha Room hosts more than 250 stories across five languages and has notched over 10,000 downloads on iOS and Android combined, while being bootstrapped.

5 hours ago

View

In the Weights is your new AI-centric vanity search

In the Weights is your new AI-centric vanity search

Anyone who’s Googled themselves recently knows that it doesn’t quite hit the way it used to. Sure, there’severything going on with Google search itself, but there’s also an inescapable feeling that web search isn’t the canonical source of information that it used to be, with just as many people learning about who you and I might be from chatbots. Thomas Dimson and Joey Flynn had a similar feeling, leading them to createIn the Weights. The“weights”in question are the numerical parameters that shape an AI model’s training and output, so the websitepurportsto measure how well “a model is able to recall someone without using tools like web search.” “Being in the weights means your existence was deemed important in the process of creating superhuman artificial intelligence,” the website says. To achieve this, In the Weights supposedly queries different models (including Grok, Gemini, multiple versions of GPT, Claude, and Llama, plus lesser known models) with a question similar to, “Who is <name>? Give up to 10 results, each with a short description and confidence.” It then “cluster[s] similar descriptions together and assign[s] a strength score.” For example,this humble tech bloggerreceived a strength score of 641, placing me in the top 6% of names. I was feeling pretty good until I saw thatmultipleTechCrunchcolleaguesscored even higher. And theleaderboardhas been shifting as I write this post, with “Home Alone” star Macaulay Culkin currently in the top slot with a strength score of 988, neck-and-neck with opera singer Luciano Pavarotti. The results also show which models returned which answers for a given name, and they highlight potential hallucinations — apparently GPT-5.4 Mini says that Anthony Ha is an “ambiguous name form that could refer to multiple people with the initials A.H.A.” Asked why he built In the Weights, Dimson told TechCrunch via email that he and Flynn were looking to “get the creative juices flowing again” after leaving OpenAI (which they both joined throughthe acquisition of their design startup Global Illumination). Dimson said he was thinking about how “Google vanity searches are the wrong objective in 2026 as more traffic moves to LLMs” and about the fact that “so many lives are encoded somehow in a bunch of floating point numbers inside the AI brain.” He also said the direction of the site was “sealed” bya tongue-in-cheek blog postriffing on AI weights and Terry Bisson’s classic short story“They’re Made Out of Meat.” “Reception has been insane so far, we thought this would be a mild curiosity but it seems like it has struck a nerve of wanting to see if you live forever in the super intelligence (the comparison factor doesn’t hurt either!)” Dimson added. While I’m not as convinced that being “remembered” by a chatbot is a guaranteed ticket to immortality, I can’t deny that I find the results both intriguing and jealousy-inducing, especially since they’re codified in an easy-to-compare score. (AI critic Anthony Moserscoffedthat this is “literally the same as asking 13 chatbots to tell you about yourself.”) Also helping: The fact that the site features a cute,Nintendo-inspiredretro design. Dimson said he plans to dig in further into why different models in the same series return different results, which models are biased towards different types of people, and which people “should have a Wikipedia article but don’t.”

13 hours ago

View

Signal’s Meredith Whittaker wants you to remember that AI chatbots ‘are not your friends’

Signal’s Meredith Whittaker wants you to remember that AI chatbots ‘are not your friends’

Asked about the privacy implications of chatbots like ChatGPT and Claude, Signal President Meredith Whittaker answered, “These are not your friends. These are not conscious beings. These are not sentient interlocutors.” Whittaker made those comments ina broader interview with Bloombergabout policy, privacy, and Signal. She acknowledged that she uses AI tools “to format a document here and there,” but insisted, “I don’t ask them questions. I’m very serious about my thinking and writing, and I don’t want the process of working through an idea […] to be foreclosed or eclipsed by the response of a system that’s averaging what’s already out there.” As for Microsoft AI CEOMustafa Suleyman’s predictionthat users could let Microsoft Copilot handle all their Christmas shopping this year, Whittaker argued this scenario — where Copilot is eavesdropping on the family group chat to determine who wants want — means giving it “access to my credit card, my browser, my Signal, the ability to message my siblings on my behalf, my home address [and] my calendar.” “What you’ve just described is a system with very pervasive access across multiple applications and services,” Whittaker said. “In the context of Signal, it would constitute a kind of a backdoor.”

13 hours ago

View

Nobel laureate John Jumper is leaving DeepMind for rival Anthropic

Nobel laureate John Jumper is leaving DeepMind for rival Anthropic

John Jumper, who shared a recent Nobel Prize in chemistry, announced Friday that he’s making the leap to Anthropic after “nearly 9 years” at Google DeepMind. Ina post on X, Jumper wrote that DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis “took a real chance letting me lead the AlphaFold team just six months after finishing my PhD, and the entire GDM team taught me so much about how to do great science.” Jumper (pictured above right, with Hassabis) added, “GDM is a special place, and I’ll still be excited to hear about what amazing things they discover next.” Bloomberg reports that Jumper wasa key member of Google’s team developing coding tools, which the company has struggled to sell to businesses. Character AI co-founder Noam Shazeer also announced this week thathe’s leaving DeepMind— though in Shazeer’s case, he’s joining OpenAI. Jumper and Hassabis won the Nobel Prize in 2024for their work on AlphaFold, an AI model that can predict the 3D structure of proteins based on their genetic sequences.

17 hours ago

View